2013年10月1日 星期二

批判互動設計作業01 / D10110103 / 陳俊中

After Life Euthanasia Device

Euthanasia is still a highly controversial issue, full of the conflict between technology, medicine, religion and philosophizing. However, if the person's free will is supreme, there is no reason not to decide when to die. Instead of euthanasia operation keys over to someone else, not as controlled by our own—a euthanasia device controlled by me. One kind of energy caused by the death of another person to help start the endpoint machine. When the meaning of death is traditionally viewed as darkness and fear, why not do the aesthetic and poetic style leader for the final journey.  

Dunne & Raby propose a sharp physical critique that euthanasia as an act of righteous struggle from the design point of view. To the general public can not deliberately ignore the inevitable problems - the boundaries of human free will. People have the right to decide how issues such as the presence or abandon the presence and with the help and guidance of the deceased before the concept of confrontation suicide on religious criticism. Specifically the last person alive to give free will decision, the embodiment of the characterization of full bright and clean.

安樂死至今仍是一個極具爭議的議題,充滿科技、醫學、宗教與哲思間的衝突,但如果人的自由意志是至高無上,沒有理由不能決定該何時死去,與其把安樂死的操作鑰匙放之他手,還不如操之在我--由自我操控的安樂死設備,一種由死亡引發能量來協助另一個人啟動這終結的機械。當死亡意義被傳統視做幽暗與恐懼時,何不用美學與詩意的型式來做為最後路程的引領者。 

Dunne & Raby 將安樂死爭義化作為行動,從設計觀點去提出一種尖銳的實體批判,使大眾無法刻意忽視必然的存在問題--人自由意志的界線?人是否有權決定如何存在或放棄存在等議題,並用先逝者協助與引導的概念對抗宗教上對自殺者的批判,具體賦予人活著的最後一個自由意志決定,化身為充滿光亮潔淨的表徵。

沒有留言:

張貼留言